Showing posts with label reuse. Show all posts
Showing posts with label reuse. Show all posts

Tuesday, December 20, 2011

The Art of Gift Giving

Did you know between Thanksgiving and New Year’s, an extra million tons of waste is generated each week by Americans?

One of the first few things I noticed about America and Christmas day was how frequently I see joyous people carrying bags of trash to the curbside after all the screaming excitements of gift openings. The idea of wrapping something in beautiful and expensive paper just to have it torn away escapes me, but after 20 years of living in the States, I have given in to the practice. Still, every time I carry out my own bag of perfectly good wrapping paper torn in pieces in a large trash-bag, I think about my father’s tale of how he once collected empty cigarette boxes and used the blank insides as writing paper for school. What I throw away each year in wrapping paper would’ve supplied him for a whole year’s worth of note taking. For that, I am ashamed.

Times likes these ask us to pause and reflect for a moment. What is wrong with this picture?

According to the Clean Air Council:

Each year the average American office worker uses about 500 disposable cups. We throw away enough paper and plastic cups, forks, and spoons to circle the equator 300 times annually. From those discarded disposables, over 7 billion pounds of PVC are thrown away and only 18 million pounds of that, about one quarter of one percent, is recycled.

Every year, Americans also use around 1 billion shopping bags, creating 300,000 tons of landfill waste. Less than 1 percent of plastic bags are recycled each year. The rest ends up in landfills. Light breaks them down into smaller and smaller particles and they then seek to contaminate the soil and water and are expensive and difficult to remove. When the small particles from photo-degraded plastic bags get into the water, they are ingested by filter feeding marine animals. Biotoxins like PCBs that are in the particles are then passed up the food chain, including up to humans. What an irony next time you buy a can of tuna that requires two plastic bags to wrap and carry around.

In 2003, 290 million tires were discarded by Americans and130 million of these tires were burned as fuel attributing to pollutants in our air. In 2004, 275 million tires were reported in stockpiles. Tires in stockpiles often serve as a breeding ground for mosquitoes and a habitat for rodents, spreading diseases causing havoc on the health of the poor who cannot afford but live near such things. These tires in stockpiles also retain heat and can easily ignite creating toxin-emitting, hard-to-extinguish, fires that can burn for months.

Of the 2.25 million tons of electronics (TVs, cell phones, computers, etc) retired in 2007, 82 percent were discarded, mostly to landfills. About 304 million electronics were disposed of from US households in 2005. Two-thirds of them still worked. These electronics not only contain rare metals and parts that we could reuse or recover, but contain poisonous elements that may cause havoc on our lands.

And finally, do you drink bottled water? Did you know at least 90 percent of the price of a bottle of water is for things other than the water itself, like bottling, packaging, shipping and marketing? 44 percent of ‘purified’ bottled water sold in the U.S. started out as municipal water. It takes about 1,100 to 2,000 times as much energy to produce and transport the average bottle of water as to produce the same amount of tap water.

EPA reports that approximately 33% of municipal waste are recycled, but this does not account for waste that are burned or filled in unpermitted landfills and incinerators.

The unregistered landfills usually do not have adequate barriers to prevent land contamination and will eventually break down and leak leachate into ground and surface water. Most people who build these off-the-map-landfills use plastic, which is not inert and allows chemicals and gases to pass through. In 2008, a survey of landfills found that 82 percent of surveyed landfill cells had leaks, while 41 percent had a leak larger than 1 square foot.

Incinerators are even worse problems contributing as a major source of 210 different dioxin compounds, plus mercury, cadmium, nitrous oxide, hydrogen chloride, sulfuric acid, fluorides, and particulate matter small enough to lodge permanently in the lungs. In 2007, the EPA acknowledged that despite recent tightening of emission standards for waste incineration power plants, the waste-to-energy process still “create significant emissions, including trace amounts of hazardous air pollutants.”

Of course our problems are not going to go away if we simply ignore them. Mathematical evidences suggest acceleration and tipping points with wider problem margins. In 1960, each American only generated 2.68 pounds of waste per day. In 1970, the figure was 3.25. Since 2000, when the average American generated 4.65 lbs of waste per day, and only 29% was recycled. American per capita food waste increased to more than 1,400 calories per person per day in 2009, an increase of approximately 50 percent since 1974. Between 1997 and 2007, bottled water consumption in the U.S. more than doubled, from 13.4 gallons per person to 29.3 gallons per person. About 40 million computers have become obsolete in 2007, about twice as many as in 1998.

The production cycles for PVC related products, plastic forks, cups, etc., are energy intensive. PVC’s annual Chlorine production now requires nearly the annual output of eight medium-sized nuclear power plants. Imagine what we can do with all that energy or how much less health and environmental problems we would face if we cut away our need for those plants.

About a million tons of plastic PET water bottles were produced in the U.S. in 2006, requiring the energy equivalent of 50 million barrels of oil. 76.5 percent of these bottles ended up in landfills.

Recycling one ton of plastic bags costs $4,000. The recycled product can be sold for $32. Municipalities have determined there is a real cost in handling these plastic bags, making the total economic burden of these plastic bags a drain on our productive progress. Surely there are better things we could do with our money, time, and energy.

If we recycled all of the cell phones retired each year, we would save enough energy to power 18,500 homes for a year. Recycling one million laptops saves enough energy to power 3,657 American homes in a year. Recycling one million cell phones allows 35,274 pounds of copper, 772 pounds of silver, 75 pounds of gold, and 33 pounds of palladium to be recovered.

It has been estimated that recycling, re-use, and composting create six to ten times as many jobs as waste incineration and landfills. Currently, only Japan, Germany, and China have active recycling laws mandating certain level of recycling economic performance. Only China has taken the extra step and mandates aggressive production efficiency and effective material management process in its recent Circular Economy Laws and Clean Production Laws.

This year, as you unwrap your presents, enjoy your holidays with family and friends, think about how much we can cut back, how much we can change, and how much we can adopt to bring better energy efficiency, effective material management.  

Happy Holidays:

Saturday, April 2, 2011

Another lazy week at The Green Elephant

It's a busy time for me, so I will insult your intelligence by pulling content from others . . . I apologize.

This is a short but educational one: Sustainability explained (please note the reference to "quality of life" - a basic human right?)

Click here to see what the The Scientific Research Society has to say about Sustainability.

". . . industrial metabolism, dematerialization and decarbonization, life-cycle planning, design and assessment, design for the environment, extended producer responsibility, product stewardship, eco-industrial parks industrial symbiosis, product-oriented environmental policy, and eco-efficiency . . ."

See, for example, Industrial Metabolism: Theory and Policy, Ayres, R. U., pp. 23–37, and other papers in The Greening of Industrial Ecosystems, ed. B. R. Allenby and D. J. Richards, National Academy Press, Washington, 1994, and The Industrial Green Game, ed. D. J. Richards, National Academy Press, 1997.
I think I've found some more reading material . . ..

More information about the journal can be found on the World Wide Web at Many of us hope that this growing system view of industry and environment will continue to have a useful influence on industrial practices.
I would only add: and a significant impact on consumer practices. Now which drives which? are the consumers in charge and responsible or the industry? or are they both jointly liable to Earth?

Tuesday, March 22, 2011

Before and After: Hardcore Pawn Stars, who are the Celebrities of Reuse.

(Pawn Stars and Hardcore Pawn)

We hear it all the time these days.

I forget sometimes that aside from reducing to recycling, reusing goes beyond just washing our zip-lock bags and saving glass jars. But what keeps me from reusing are some deep rooted false belief that I'm somehow better than the concept of pawning. But I realized I am one of those "I don't care" people and think I should buy things new. I realized I was wrong after Lauren had threaten to set up lawn chairs and serve popcorn at a local pawn shop after watching the new pawn stars from Detroit on TV.

She was excited for all of the drama that happens, fashionably decorated with memories and stories embedded in items we could reuse. She looked at me and said seriously, “reduce, reuse, recycle; right?”

I agreed. The thought of setting up recliners at a pawn shop with some popcorn intrigued me. It also made me wonder if I would actually enjoy finding out what items are being reused, and why. May be I can figure out what other items can be reused by the community, and how we can lower the overall economic and environmental impacts of making these things by just REUSE THEM.

the green elephant Headline Animator