Monday, April 23, 2012

Strip Mining - by Lauren Campbell

On April 6th I got to tour the Bear Run coal mine (BRM) in Sullivan County, Indiana. Bear Run coal mine is the largest coal strip mine east of the Mississippi river. It spans approximately 15,000 acres and operates 24 hours a day 365 days a year, producing 8 million of tons of coal per year. Coal production is scheduled to rise next year, increasing the production to 12 million tons per year.

The mine drew some attention in the local media recently. The Indianapolis Star also published a story back in January about the health risks of the coal mine. There was also a petition making its way around the Internet (the petition is now closed). That is really the end of the coal mine’s media limelight… just about 15 minutes of fame if you will. This is why my classmates and I wanted to research further into Bear Run’s operations and make our own decisions about its significance.

What was more curious, it seems, is how the largest strip mine in the eastern United States has not drawn a larger discussion on the topic, save a few pages in the Star and an online petition?

We began with reading up on Peabody Energy, the company that owns and operates BRM. We then decided to tour the mine itself; after the movie Erin Brockivich, who can resist some harmless snooping?

Before we took our tour, we researched the environmental issue to the extent that we could. We discovered that BRM is operating under a general permit, which is what has Hoosiers divided on the mining issue. The Hoosier Environmental Council (HEC) portrays the situation as though BRM is breaking laws, such as the Clean Water Act and the Clean Air Act while BRM, along with IDEM, claim no laws are broken and that the mine is operating within all legal standards.

We then looked into Peabody Energy itself--BRM’s owner and operator. Peabody Energy is one of the largest energy companies in the world; located in 21 different nations and on 6 different continents. They provide 10 percent of all US electricity and 2 percent of all global power. They purchased the mineral rights to the coal here in Indiana some years back, but then had to slowly purchase the surface land from locals who lived on top of the coal Peabody wanted. Many locals sold, a few remained. I presumed given Peabody’s size and extensive business operations, following rules and regulations was something they took seriously; at least it appears in Indiana they are.

Federal law mandates that all coal mine operations have permits to operate within a safe and sound parameter.

More than three dozen federal environmental laws and regulations cover all aspects of mining. The following list includes some of those major laws. In addition, each state has laws and regulations that mining companies must follow.
  • National Environmental Policy Act - requires an interdisciplinary approach to environmental decision making. 
  • Federal Land Policy and Management Act - prevents undue and unnecessary degradation of federal lands. 
  • Clean Air Act - sets air quality standards. 
  •  Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Act) - directs standards for surface water quality and controlling discharges to surface water.
  • Safe Drinking Water Act - directs standards for quality of drinking water supplied to the public (states are primary authorities) and regulating underground injection operations. 
  • Solid Waste Disposal Act - regulates generation, storage and disposal of hazardous waste and manages solid, non-hazardous waste (states). 
  • Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act -requires reporting of hazardous substance releases and inventory of chemicals handled. 
  • Toxic Substance Control Act - requires regulation of chemicals that present risk to health or environment. 
  • Endangered Species Act - lists threatened plants and animals; protection plans mandated. 
  • Migratory Bird Treaty Act - protects nearly all bird species. 
  • Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act - regulates coal mining operations and reclamation.
Other laws that impact mining include: the Rivers and Harbors Act, the Federal Mining Law, the National Historic Preservation Act, the Law Authorizing Treasury's Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms to Regulate Sale, Transport and Storage of Explosives, and the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act. 

Under the circumstances, mining companies are required to obtain individual permits that require testing for specific pollutants enumerated in our environmental protection laws (arsenic, mercury, etc.,); these pollutants have stricter environmental and discharge standards due to their toxicity and serious threat to health and safety standards. In Indiana, however, coal mines operate under a general permit, which appears to operate under a more relaxed discharge standards. Being the curious ones that we are and the left and right squabbles in a less and less trustworthy media, we decided to tour the mine see for ourselves how BRM operates.

We arrived in Sullivan county around 11 am or so. BRM is located in Sullivan county but is large enough to cover an area of three towns or so: Carlisle, Sullivan, and Duggar. We were lost at first. There were quite a few roads closed and with a car full of gadget dependent city dwellers, we somehow stumbled upon a lake: Locust Lake.

We stopped. We thought to look at the lake more closely, we wanted to see the water at least. We met a couple of fisherman and asked for directions to the BRM main office. Bob, the gentleman we spoke to, had lived in Carlisle for decades and had a lot of information about the mining operations in the region. He told us that Locust Lake was once an old “strip pit” from strip mining. It had been left open to collect water and then was labeled as a lake. Bob showed us a local map pointed out all of the “lakes” in the area—old strip pits that were left open, to fill with rain and then labeled lakes.

The Department of Natural Resources fills these lakes with fish for the locals to fish. Bob didn’t seem to mind fishing out of an old coal mining pit. Although he had no complaints about the lakes or the fish, he did say that he didn’t like how much power BRM wielded. The coal mines are the reason the roads we had passed were closed; “the can just shut a road down and not tell anyone why or when.”

BRM can also reclaim any lake at any point for personal use. Bob said that this had happened recently: Deep lake was a lake that he and his friends enjoyed fishing and that now they can’t access it because BRM is using it for their operations. He said most locals do not like BRM for that reason; the strings they are able to pull to get whatever they want.

We asked about BRM’s support of the local economy. Bob said that the mine only employs about 500 people from the area and that he doesn’t see any real economic benefit for him or his community.

We enjoyed our time speaking with Bob, but we had to be on our way for our tour.

When we arrived at BRM, Mark, a reclamation foreman had been waiting on us. We spent the next 3 hours with Mark driving through the area, seeing the mines and appreciating the enormity of their operations.

"mining slurry" - Coal slurry consists of solid and liquid waste and is a by-product of the coal mining and preparation processes. This impounded liquid waste can sometimes total billions of gallons in a single facility. Coal slurry contains a large range of constituents, including dissolved minerals that have been leached or washed out of the coal and other rocks. In addition, the slurry contains chemicals added to facilitate the washing or water re-use processes. One of these chemicals is acrylamide.
Mark took us through the entire process; it was quite the experience. Mark was very informative and answered any question that we had. He explained how the mining was done and some of the byproducts as resulted of their operations. One thing in particular that caught my attention was the waste water Mark called “slurry” that came from washing the coals that were mined. I asked about what they did with the slurry and he replied “it goes into the open cuts in pit 3; which you won’t be seeing today.” I don’t know what an ‘open cut’ is; but I did wonder if it was lined properly so as to not allow polluted water disturb the ground water supply.

Mark also mentioned something about a “gob” which according to him is dumped back into the pit and must be at least 50 feet down and filled in. This surprised me. I thought the kind of nasty industrial by products labeled as “gob” would be handled in a more environmentally friendly way; how many gob pits are the people of Sullivan county walking over or having their tap water run through?

We left the mine with a new understanding of how BRM operates; the process of how coal is mined as well as the low environmental standards Indiana has for the coal mining operations. We drove around a bit more, taking in the local scenery; we were interested in seeing how many “strip pit lakes” we could find. We parked ourselves on a side road, next to a bridge that was built by Peabody Energy for the railroad system they needed for transporting coal. When we looked down into the ditch and saw the water running were black, our first question was “Is this from BRM?”

Picture of water in the ditch outside of BRM


I do not know if we will ever find out, but it does make me wonder who or what is on the receiving end of that water…. How many people are drinking diluted black water?

In all of our research, webinars with the HEC, getting lost in Carlisle, and our private tour, we walked away with a new appreciation for the coal mining in Indiana. For me, if BRM is operating within the legal boundaries, those boundaries are obviously not keeping our waters clean. If the coal mines are allowed to operate under a general permit in Indiana and not meet the specific pollutant discharge standards, then it is up to the residents of Indiana to demand higher quality of our own lives.


7 comments:

  1. First of all, your editor should've looked over this article because there are mispelled words and several typo mistakes!! Secondly, if you didn't understand what something meant, you should've asked your guide, who I am very sure took some time away from his busy job to be so kind to show you around. I think this is a very disrespectful article of the Bear Run Mine and its employees. This just goes to show how little you know about the coal mine industry. They have laws and regulations they have to follow and are inspected very frequently. I'm positive the mine would not be in operation if there were very many violations, so get your facts straight. Finally, as for BOB, I'm not sure how long this man has been living under a rock, but I believe 500 employees in one place for such a small community is very applaudable. Bear Run Mine has done wonderful things for the local community and donates money to many local businesses, schools and organizations.
    There are a lot of critics out there when it comes to the coal mining industry. All that I have to say to those who critize is this, "The next time you turn on your television, flip on a light switch, or are keeping warm or cool in your home, thank a coal mine! There's no rat running on a big power wheel somewhere making energy. It's a hard working coal miner giving you that luxury of electricity!!"

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sir/Madam,

    You are correct. When I turn on my TV, flip on the lights, we are probably using electricity provided for by coal; even at a government subsidy perhaps. I am very thankful that I live in a place where that is possible, giving me the luxury that most others in the world may not enjoy. Yet I've seen places and people where that is not possible, nor do they have the freedom and privilege we so enjoy. I wish just a bit more equality in this world that's all.

    The point of a first hand account of story telling, which this blog noticed readers, is not to just give facts, but to express our aspirations. We do not wish to criticize although sometimes our immaturity masks our real intentions and come across as being critical.

    This was a learning exercise, the sentiment expressed therefore reflect as you said, "how little [we] know about the coal mine industry." Yet, I failed to see where disrespect happened?

    For our spelling mistakes and grammar problems, please excuse the carelessness. I return the favor of a benefit of doubt that you do not mean any disrespect by your anonymous comment.

    Yours truly,

    jin

    ReplyDelete
  3. Definitely a one sided view which is skewed with an enviro twist!
    After a little research, all water quality parameters are being met and exceeded. Where is your critique of the beautiful reclaimed streams and wetlands on the site as well as prime farmland reclaimed to continue to produce our feedstock at premining yields?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Feel free to write for the other side and send it to us for posting... We are always open to a second opinion. I've seen some data with regards to reclaimed farmlands and "wetlands" but my knowledge are confined to books and other "one sided" opinions by people with an enviro twist...

    One step removed is also the industrial farming that has secondary effects on the productivity of the land itself. Would like to see if the reclaiming process actually put land and waterways back on a sustainable course; or does the reclaiming process just put the land and water to an acceptable norm we think of as "productive" without regards for how the land and water will be in the long run?

    there are always two side with every view. We will own up to our enviro twist, what is yours? Our hopes is that we can one day be completely independent of coal and other exhaustible fuel sources, but it seems you are not looking at that long term? Is your children's children's concern not yours? Or are you living with some kind of end-of-the-world retirement plan without due regards for the future? Or else you do not have children you would like for them to inherit this earth of ours?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Various political and religious leaders and media pundits have been trying very hard for many years to teach people that they should put short-sighted profit motive above all else. So-called capitalism *is* religion in the U.S., and it's become blasphemous to point out how the greed of a few hurts the well-being of many.

    Whether a company works within legal boundaries is meaningless these days. There can be no meaningful legal compliance OR regulation as long as there are lobbyists who grease the palms of lawmakers and regulators. Further, the corporations are starting to eliminate the middleman and simply write the laws themselves (e.g., take a look at the American Legislative Exchange Council and who funds them).

    Thus, "legal compliance" and the public good are on increasingly divergent paths.

    Further, Peabody, a multibillion dollar company, recently cheated hundreds of workers out of their pensions and health insurance -- programs employees paid into all their lives. (http://www.businessweek.com/ap/2012-10-25/umw-sues-arch-peabody-over-patriot-benefits) Many miners became terminally ill after working in those mines, and now they are being left without health care or retirement savings. Does that sound "very applaudable"? What do you think is going to happen to those folks? And watch out, BRM and its workers could be next.

    In short, YOU don't benefit from a corporation's profit motive, and neither do hardworking coalminers -- and no one here is disputing their lifelong hard work and sweat. But you need to realize that you are being lied to and used so some wealthy executive can make a buck and laugh all the way to the bank.

    People who speak in favor of sustainability and protecting the environment are not your enemy. Your outcry is misdirected here.

    ReplyDelete
  6. The more the number of points, the higher is the rating of the building which accounts for high energy efficiency of the building. Tom

    ReplyDelete